CITIZEN KANE: NARRATIVE INTERPRETATION

 

B&T:  we canÕt escape stories, even by going to sleep.

In a narrative events are connected spatially.

Gestalt: We make sense of a narrative, then, by identifying its events and linking them by cause and effect, time, and space

We connect things together through inference:  we infer that Roger Thornhill had a busy day b/c of the way heÕs dictating narrative depends so heavily on cause and effect, and the agents of cause and effect are characters

character traits

the plot=the action that we see

Éthe story goes beyond the plot

 

Time

As we watch a film, we construct story time on the basis of what the plot presents.

Temporal Order (p. 75)

Have you ever seen a film where itÕs not in chronological order? Where the end comes before the beginning?

We are quite accustomed to films that present events out of story order.

A flashback: Titanic

 

Temporal Duration (p. 75)

Does the film cover a day or an entire life? 

Little Miss Sunshine:  2 days.

Juno:  a year

plot duration selects from story duration

screen duration selects from overall plot duration

 

Temporal Frequency (p. 76)

Sometimes you see the same event in the film more than once.

 

 

Space (p. 80)

Events tend to occur in particular locales

One of the few films ever made inside a major studio in the U.S. in freedom Ðnot merely freedom from interference but freedom of the routine methods of experienced directors.

Space can also become the basis for a plot pattern. This usually happens when

the action is confined to a single locale, such as a train

 

Openings, Closings, Patterns of Development (p. 80)

Film doesnÕt just open, it BEGINS

The most common general pattern is a change in knowledge.

               Goal oriented plot (searchesÉRaiders of Lost Arc)

               Investigation (criminal)

Climax

A film does not simply stop; it ends.

 

 

 

Narration of Story Information (p. 82):

divulging story information at various points

Narration = when the plot arranges cues in ways that withhold information for the sake of

curiosity or surprise, or supplies information in such a way as to create expectations or increase suspense.

ÒWho knows what when?Ó

 

Range of Story information (p. 83)

Unrestricted or omniscient narration; restricted narration (important to mystery films)

Hitchcock works so well b/c we know and the subject does not. 

 

Depth of Story information (p. 85)

how deeply does the plot plunge into a characterÕs psychological states?

This is about the continuum between objectivity and subjectivity

Point of view:  whoÕs pov?

Flashbacks are usually motivated as mental subjectivity

 

Narrator (p. 86)

Character narrator; voice of god

 

Hollywood cinema

the assumption that the action will spring primarily from individual characters as causal agents

Cause and effect imply change.

Most films display a strong degree of closure at the End

 

I. VIEWING CONTEXT 62 YEARS AGO

Viewing the film in 1941 would have been different than viewing it today, especially in the artificial constructs of a classroom.

In 1941 it was almost impossible to see.

Critics praised it.

Theaters wouldnÕt show it:  too scared.

 

RKO picture

 

Big 5 (little 3)

Paramount

MGM

Warner Bros.

Twentieth Century Fox

RKO (owned just a few theaters)

Columbia

Universal

United Artists

 

Only RKO theaters would show CK

And of the RKO theaters, many bought the film, but refused to screen it.

Even RKOÕs Radio City Music Hall didnÕt run it, when a Hearst columnist threated to write an expose on Rockefeller, who owned part of Radio City Music Hall.

 

MGM head, Louis B. Mayer, went to RKO head before the film was released

Offered him $800,000 to destroy the film (negatives and all)Ñthe $800,000 came from the four other top studios. 

Studios were scared they would lose favoritism from Hearst, and wanted to indicate to Hearst that they werenÕt against him/his newspapers.

RKO said NO

              

So you see,  it was a very bold move to make this movie, and there was a sort of electricity about its production.

In the history of America

Big business was attacked in the 1900s. Muckraking journalists, which often found a voice in Hearst papers.

Big business was attacked in the late 1920s, early1930s. (New Deal policies/FDR)

Big business was gaining ground in the 1940s, and even more so in the 1950s.

Hearst papers had a huge empire, and were very powerful.

                              Supported big business (and were supported by big business).

What Orson Welles did in 1941 was something of a scandal.

 

So if people DID see the movie, there was all this anticipation about how similar the movie would be to HearstÕs life.

And there WERE similarities.

               Welles = Hearst (same stature)

               Susan Alexander=Marion Davies

                              Not so talented

               Jigsaw puzzles

Kane built opera house=Hearst supported MGM

 

 

II. Reading the film narrative

We donÕt have this viewing context today, obviously, but at least we can appreciate CK in terms of how it craftily breaks the norms of Classical Hollywood Cinema:

And part of the fun of CK (not to mention many excellent movies) is trying to determine what exactly the AUTHOR meant by various elements in the film.

 

FORMAL EXPECTATIONS

In terms of Formal Expectations, letÕs talk about how our expectations are constantly challenged in Citizen Kane

 

Hollywood Cinema Norms:

               Active, goal-oriented protagonist: searching for a specific thing: find it at the end:

               INVESTIGATION

Sequences are often demarcated by cinematic devices (fades, dissolves, cuts, black

screen, and so on) and form meaningful units.

 

Citizen Kane:

               Desires, traits, goals are not spelled out.

               There is no search for an object, but for character traits.

               Conflicts have an uncertain outcome

               At the end, the narrationÕs omniscience (the fact that weÕre let in on somethingÑwhat Rosebud is) was way more than normal.

No closure at the end.              

              

Citizen Kane thwarts our expectations of certain formal conventions.

We talked about how thwarted expectations can be thrilling and challenging, and give us suspense, and surpriseÉ

But first viewing, especially for you watching this film in this artificial context, many aspects of CK can seem UNSATISFYING

From a narrative perspective, We have to work a little harder to understand it.

 

Luckily, we have the luxury to watch it multiple times.

And in adjusting our expectations to a disorienting work, we can hopefully more appreciate its utter mastery.

 

 

LOOK AT PLOT SEGMENTATION:

REORIENTATION TO THE PLOT OF CITIZEN KANE   

 

Functions

               Similarity & Repetition

               Differences and Variation

               Development

               Unity/Disunity of Citizen Kane

 

(Five principles of Film form)

 

A. FUNCTION

Element                                           Function:

 

KaneÕs death                                 Stimulates newsreel, search for Rosebud underway

Deed to gold mine                     Wealth.  Propels story, gets CK out of boarding house

Mother sending CK away       Grows up into a rebellious, spoiled man

Father                                               One reason his mother wanted to send him away

Thatcher, rich businessman   Motivates his presence on newsreel: heÕs powerful enough to testify at Congressional hearing (shown in newsreel)

                                                            His success motivated him to write a journal, now on deposit in Thatcher memorial library

                                                            Can explain Kane as a child.

 

ALL CHARACTERS HAVE A PARTICULAR FUNCTION:

 

  1. Thatcher: covers Kane as child/young man
  2. Bernstein: covers KaneÕs newspaper/business dealings
  3. Leland: best friend, learn about 1st marriage, 2nd marriage
  4. Susan: learn about 2nd marriage, middle age
  5. Raymond: covers Kane as old man

 

These interviews play a causal role in KaneÕs life, as well as in the investigation.

 

 

Much of the filmÕs power arises from the complex ways in which the plot cues us to construct the story.

 

  1. First scene informs and disorients us: shows the death of Kane, a character about which we know almost nothing.
  2. News on the March: serves to inform and disorient.

 

Parallels Film

               Xanadu: like opening of film

               Funeral: after opening, the first thing we see is KaneÕs death

               Headlines: Occupy same position as newsreel itself

               Title Card: ÒTo 44 million U.S. news buyers, more newsworthy than the names in his own headlines was Kane himselfÓ

Corresponds to reporters discussing KaneÕs newsworthiness

               Growth of Empire

               Boarding House           first mention of sled/Thatcher & Bernstein

               Thatcher testimony

               Political career

               Private life

               Private life/ weddings&divorces    Leland

               Opera house

               Political campaign       Susan

               Depression

               1935: KaneÕs old age

               Isolation                           Raymond

               Death

 

=striking similarities

The film functions as a map

BF: SHOW NEWSREEL

 

  1. El Ranchero: functions to introduce the closest living relative, but defers her interview until later
  2. Thatcher: covers boyhood, newspaper purchase, attack on big business, selling newspaper; The Depression
  3. Bernstein: His recollections happen in the middle of ThatcherÕs recollections
  4. LelandÕs memory: continues BernsteinÕs recollections
  5. SusanÕs memory: continues from Leland
  6. RaymondÕs memory: continues from Susan

=First recollections are broad.

  Later recollections are specific

 

Welles confuses the viewer in the beginning, but makes it clear later

 

Every element has a specific function, and we could talk about every element all week:

What did Orson Welles really mean by the snow at the beginning of the movie?

Is this really the inside of KaneÕs memory? Does the snow directly connect to this sled?

 

 

b. SIMILARITY REPETITION, which reinforce certain themes or ideas in the movie.

a) Opera scenes

               News on the March

               Leland (see perspective of audience, distaste)

               Susan (see her perspective)

                              =so three times.  The opera must be significant comment on KaneÕs character, a turning point.

                              Music is so memorable!

 

b) Writing the review

               Leland (We learn Kane wrote review, panned his wife)

               Susan (she thinks Kane tried to bribe Leland, but was powerless to influence opinion)

$25,000 is returned

               Why did Kane give this to Leland?

               =A comment on KaneÕs character

               was it a gesture at friendship?

               Was it b/c  he wanted to prove himself more generous than Leland?

 

c) Snow globe

               Opening

               Saves it from SusanÕs demolished room (after she accuses him of never doing anything for sentimental purposes)

               End

                             

d) cup at beginning and end

We learn he has lots of junk.  We learn that perhaps he is very sentimentalÉthereÕs more to him than just his need to manipulate others.

 

e) Rosebud

               See sled in beginning (provides transition from boardinghouse to cheerless Xmas where Kane gets a new sled.)

               Sled at the end

 

So thereÕs SIMILARITY AND REPETITION, but within this thereÕs also DIFFERENCE AND VARIATION.

 

The Plot both assists our search and complicates it.

 

DEVELOPMENT

               How things progress

               How our impression of the sled in the beginning is different than our impression of the sled in the end

               How our understanding of Kane becomes more clear, but also more tangled.

 

PLAYING WITH TIME

               Investigation: 1 week

               Plot covers about 70 years, from KaneÕs childhood to his death.

 

               Time is compressed, via montage sequences

 

Breakfast scene:

 

Emily=woman of his dreams, who he brought back from Europe like one of his statues.

Their marriage will collapse, like everything Kane touches.

The severity and intensity of this collapse are captured in one two-minute sequence.

It remains the most striking example of WellesÕ evocative and economical editing in CK.

 

Begins: MS

               Warm light

               Conversation is teasing, intimate

               Visually reinforced by loving looks

               He tells her sheÕs beautiful, when she complains, he says heÕll adapt for her.

 

5 more shot/reverse-shot pairs.

In each, eyes of the couple grow increasingly suspicious and severe

The conversations are progressively hostile and clipped

The newspaper becomes both a visual and verbal symbol of their growing division.

               Note how they talk about the newspaper/his job/too much time spent there

               First: ÒCharles, if I didnÕt trust youÉwhat do you do on a newspaper in the middle of the night? (wants more say in how he spends his time)

               Third: Emily pleads w/ him to stop attacking her uncle, the president (wants more say in what is printedÑattacks one particular article)

               Fifth: Attacks entire paper: ÒReally, Charles, people have a right to expectÉÓ(Kane: Òwhat I care to give them.Ó)=really criticizing the paper.

 

Changes in clothing (from romantic to formal)

=passage of time is also a passage away from emotional intimacy

The setting alters from an unobstructed and close space to an obstructed space cluttered w/ plants, flowers and newspapers.

Last shot:

               Eyes no longer match, since theyÕre reading separate papers.

               He: The Inquirer.  She: The Chronicle.

               They are far apart, opposite sides off the frame.

               The shot has much colder and darker lighting.

 

Real time of this sequence is many years.

Through rigorous and creative use of an edited space, and a series of conversations w/in that space, Welles depicts more than just the synopsis of a failed marriage.

               He also tells a succinct and cinematic version of the entire tale of CK:

                              How KaneÕs greatest desires seem to turn to dust almost immediately after he achieves them.

How he consequently becomes a man always alientated in the great spaces that surround him.

              

Other montages:  growth of papersÕ circulation; SusanÕs opera career

 

UNITY/DISUNIITY

 

Unity: 

Beginning is just like ending

               Rosebud; audience finally figures out what it is: the sled

                             

               No Trespassing sign

                              =Suggests that at Xanadu, donÕt trespass on this life: youÕll NEVER get into KaneÕs head!

              

Disnunity #1: Thompson gives up search for Rosebud, doesnÕt reach goal

ÒNo word can explain a manÕs lifeÓ

 

               However: thereÕs plenty of suggestions all through the film that this is the filmÕs firm message

                              Newsreel meeting: Òmaybe he told us all about himself on his deathbedÓ

                              Other reporter Òyeah, and maybe he didnÕtÓ

                              = already suggestion is made that Rosebud quest is pointless.

                             

                              Leland scornfully dismisses Rosebud issue

                              =all these comments justify and ÒunifyÓ ThompsonÕs pessimistic view in the final sequence

              

But then WE know what Rosebud means. 

 

But we can ask: Does this sled really, in some ways, sums up KaneÕs life?

                              Or is this too easy a gimmick?

                              ThereÕs a debate among critics to this day

                              ThereÕs lots of ambiguity about what Welles meant.

 

Disunity #2: Kane never reaches his goal

               (although we never know what that is)

               Is it happiness?  What indeed, makes him happy?

               There are small glimmers:  The way he saved the snow globe, the way he kept the cup.

 

 

Ultimately, what is this film about?

Memory and Perception?

               How one canÕt construct a life from various points of view.

               All 5 narratives had restricted frames of knowledge

                              Thatcher: only see scenes in which he was present

                              Bernstein: heÕs thereÉmay have the best recollection

                              Leland: not always there (e.g., Kane and SusanÕs love scene), and drunk

                              Susan: drunk as she recalls

                              Raymond: in hallway

                             

                             

Is it a critique on Objectivity?  How life is much more complicated and one canÕt simply capture all the elements of an individual in a newspaper story.

 

RKO  paid the priceÉ

Because of what Hearst could do (and what Hollywood feared it could do), the studio was more or less ruined by CK.

               Orson WellesÕ career was pretty much ruined

               Herman Mankiewicz was shut out as a screenwriter.

 


FIREFLY

Firefly: The Train Job  Season 1 : Ep. 2   (43:21)

Firefly: Bushwhacked  Season 1 : Ep. 3   (44:31)

Firefly: Shindig  Season 1 : Ep. 4   (44:35)

Firefly: Safe  Season 1 : Ep. 5   (44:33)

Firefly: Our Mrs. Reynolds  Season 1 : Ep. 6   (44:33)

Firefly: Jaynestown  Season 1 : Ep. 7   (44:35)

Firefly: Ariel  Season 1 : Ep. 9   (44:35)

Firefly: Trash Season 1 : Ep. 11   (44:33)

Firefly: Objects in Space  Season 1 : Ep. 14   (44:49)

Firefly: The Message Season 1 : Ep. 12   (44:22)

Firefly: War Stories Season 1 : Ep. 10   (44:29)

Firefly: Out of Gas  Season 1 : Ep. 8   (44:34)

Firefly: Heart of Gold  Season 1 : Ep. 13   (44:33)