A second trait of the print paradigm is that the information is limited to text and still images, identical to what you would find in a magazine or book. In essence, all they've done is use the WEB instead of paper, to produce a document conceptually no different to that produced on a printing press.
This is not to say that there is no good work based on the print paradigm, there are sites out there with content and layout equal to anything found in print, so quality is not the issue. The issue, however, is that the medium is not being used to its full potential. Furthermore, some communications theorists feel that the print paradigm is both intellectually limiting, encourages intellectual arrogance, and is counter to how our minds work. This is a position I fully agree with.
It is my opinion that this paradigm is an transitional paradigm and will, in the future, take on an increasingly minor role.
WEB Paradigm | Why. | Media Theory. | History and Prehistory | Print Paradigm. |
Multimedia Paradigm. | Hypertext Paradigm. | Docuverse Paradigm. | Interactive Paradigm. | Conclusions |